Competing Against Luck by Clayton M. Christensen — book cover
Creative ability in business · Customer services · Success in business

Competing Against Luck by Clayton M. Christensen — Summary, Key Ideas & Quotes

2016259 pages3-min Big ideas3.8 (4)
Rate it
What is Competing Against Luck about?

The foremost authority on innovation and growth presents a path-breaking book every company needs to transform innovation from a game of chance to one in which they develop products and services customers not only want to buy, but are willing to pay premium prices for. How do companies know how to grow? How can they create products that they are sure customers want to buy? Can innovation be more than a game of hit and miss? Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen has the answer. A generation ago, Christensen revolutionized business with his groundbreaking theory of disruptive innovation. Now, he goes further, offering powerful new insights. After years of research, Christensen has come to one critical conclusion: our long held maxim—that understanding the customer is the crux of innovation—is wrong. Customers don’t buy products or services; they "hire" them to do a job. Understanding customers does not drive innovation success, he argues. Understanding customer jobs does. The "Jobs to Be Done" approach can be seen in some of the world’s most respected companies and fast-growing startups, including Amazon, Intuit, Uber, Airbnb, and Chobani yogurt, to name just a few. But this book is not about celebrating these successes—it’s about predicting new ones. Christensen contends that by understanding what causes customers to "hire" a product or service, any business can improve its innovation track record, creating products that customers not only want to hire, but that they’ll pay premium prices to bring into their lives. Jobs theory offers new hope for growth to companies frustrated by their hit and miss efforts. This book carefully lays down Christensen’s provocative framework, providing a comprehensive explanation of the theory and why it is predictive, how to use it in the real world—and, most importantly, how not to squander the insights it provides.

A glimpse inside

Illustration for Competing Against Luck
The 'Jobs to Be Done' Theory

Christensen’s central thesis is that customers don’t simply buy products or services—they 'hire' them to accomplish specific jobs in their lives. Rather than focusing on demographics or product features, companies should strive to understand the underlying progress customers are trying to make. This perspective shifts innovation efforts from guessing what customers might like to uncovering the real-world problems they are trying to solve.

Innovation Is Not Random

The book argues that successful innovation is not a matter of luck or serendipity. Instead, it can be systematically pursued by identifying and addressing the jobs customers need done. By rigorously studying what causes customers to make the choices they do, companies can design offerings that fit seamlessly into their lives, greatly increasing the odds of success.

See all 6 key ideas →

Ratings at a glance

Open Library
3.8 / 5
4 ratings
Get smart in 3 min
6 key ideas, distilled
  1. 1The 'Jobs to Be Done' Theory
  2. 2Innovation Is Not Random
  3. 3The Pitfalls of Traditional Market Segmentation
  4. 4Uncovering Jobs Through Deep Observation
  5. 5Integrating Jobs Theory Into Company Strategy

Popular quotes from Competing Against Luck

Customers don’t buy products or services; they hire them to do a job.
The critical unit of analysis is not the customer, but the job the customer is trying to get done.

More by Clayton M. Christensen

Frequently asked

The foremost authority on innovation and growth presents a path-breaking book every company needs to transform innovation from a game of chance to one in which they develop products and services customers not only want to buy, but are willing to pay premium prices for. How do companies know how to grow? How can they create products that they are sure customers want to buy? Can innovation be more t