The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen — book cover
Industrial management · Disruptive technologies · Success in business

The Innovator's Dilemma by Clayton M. Christensen — Summary, Key Ideas & Quotes

1997286 pages3-min Big ideas4.0 (17)
Rate it
What is The Innovator's Dilemma about?

In his book, The Innovator's Dilemma [3], Professor Clayton Christensen of Harvard Business School describes a theory about how large, outstanding firms can fail "by doing everything right." The Innovator's Dilemma, according to Christensen, describes companies whose successes and capabilities can actually become obstacles in the face of changing markets and technologies. ([Source][1]) This book takes the radical position that great companies can fail precisely because they do everything right. It demonstrates why outstanding companies that had their competitive antennae up, listened astutely to customers, and invested aggressively in new technologies still lost their market leadership when confronted with disruptive changes in technology and market structure. And it tells how to avoid a similar fate. Using the lessons of successes and failures of leading companies, The Innovator's Dilemma presents a set of rules for capitalizing on the phenomenon of disruptive innovation. These principles will help managers determine when it is right not to listen to customers, when to invest in developing lower-performance products that promise lower margins, and when to pursue small markets at the expense of seemingly larger and more lucrative ones. - Jacket flap.

A glimpse inside

Illustration for The Innovator's Dilemma
Disruptive vs. Sustaining Innovation

Christensen distinguishes between sustaining innovations, which make good products better for existing customers, and disruptive innovations, which introduce simpler, cheaper, or more convenient products that initially appeal to new or underserved markets. While incumbents focus on sustaining innovations to please their core customers, they often overlook or dismiss disruptive technologies as unprofitable or irrelevant—until it’s too late.

The Innovator’s Dilemma Explained

The central dilemma is that the very practices that make companies successful—listening to customers, investing in higher-margin products, and focusing on profitability—can blind them to disruptive threats. Companies are incentivized to allocate resources to proven markets and technologies, making it hard to justify investing in unproven, low-margin innovations that may ultimately reshape the industry.

See all 6 key ideas →

Ratings at a glance

Open Library
4.0 / 5
17 ratings
Get smart in 3 min
6 key ideas, distilled
  1. 1Disruptive vs. Sustaining Innovation
  2. 2The Innovator’s Dilemma Explained
  3. 3Why Good Management Can Lead to Failure
  4. 4The Role of Resource Allocation
  5. 5How to Respond to Disruption

Popular quotes from The Innovator's Dilemma

Disruptive technology should be framed as a marketing challenge, not a technological one.
The reason why it is so difficult for existing firms to capitalize on disruptive innovations is that their processes and their business model that make them good at the existing business actually make them bad at competing for the disruption.

More by Clayton M. Christensen

Frequently asked

In his book, The Innovator's Dilemma [3], Professor Clayton Christensen of Harvard Business School describes a theory about how large, outstanding firms can fail "by doing everything right." The Innovator's Dilemma, according to Christensen, describes companies whose successes and capabilities can actually become obstacles in the face of changing markets and technologies. ([Source][1]) This boo