

Everyone would benefit from seeing further into the future, whether buying stocks, crafting policy, launching a new product, or simply planning the week’s meals. Unfortunately, people tend to be terrible forecasters. As Wharton professor Philip Tetlock showed in a landmark 2005 study, even experts’ predictions are only slightly better than chance. However, an important and underreported conclusion of that study was that some experts do have real foresight, and Tetlock has spent the past decade trying to figure out why. What makes some people so good? And can this talent be taught? In Superforecasting, Tetlock and coauthor Dan Gardner offer a masterwork on prediction, drawing on decades of research and the results of a massive, government-funded forecasting tournament. The Good Judgment Project involves tens of thousands of ordinary people—including a Brooklyn filmmaker, a retired pipe installer, and a former ballroom dancer—who set out to forecast global events. Some of the volunteers have turned out to be astonishingly good. They’ve beaten other benchmarks, competitors, and prediction markets. They’ve even beaten the collective judgment of intelligence analysts with access to classified information. They are "superforecasters." In this groundbreaking and accessible book, Tetlock and Gardner show us how we can learn from this elite group. Weaving together stories of forecasting successes (the raid on Osama bin Laden’s compound) and failures (the Bay of Pigs) and interviews with a range of high-level decision makers, from David Petraeus to Robert Rubin, they show that good forecasting doesn’t require powerful computers or arcane methods. It involves gathering evidence from a variety of sources, thinking probabilistically, working in teams, keeping score, and being willing to admit error and change course. Superforecasting offers the first demonstrably effective way to improve our ability to predict the future—whether in business, finance, politics, international affairs, or daily life—and is destined to become a modern classic.
A glimpse inside

Tetlock’s research famously showed that most experts are only marginally better than chance at predicting complex events. However, a small subset—'superforecasters'—consistently outperform both their peers and even sophisticated prediction markets. This challenges the common belief that expertise alone guarantees reliable foresight, emphasizing the need to look beyond credentials and focus on demonstrated forecasting skill.

Superforecasters aren’t necessarily subject-matter experts, but they share certain cognitive habits: open-mindedness, careful updating of beliefs, comfort with ambiguity, and a willingness to break complex problems into manageable parts. They actively seek out disconfirming evidence and revise their predictions incrementally, rather than clinging to initial beliefs or grand theories.
Ratings at a glance
- 1The Myth of Expert Infallibility
- 2Traits of Superforecasters
- 3The Power of Probabilistic Thinking
- 4The Value of Aggregation and Teamwork
- 5Continuous Learning and Feedback
Popular quotes from Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
“Belief in the power of collective judgment is not a faith. It is a conclusion.”
“The average expert was roughly as accurate as a dart-throwing chimpanzee.”
“Superforecasting demands thinking that is open-minded, careful, curious, and—above all—self-critical.”